CO₂ Fracturing and Permeability Enhancement Technology for Low-Permeability Coal Seams

1. Definition and Fundamental Principles

CO₂ fracturing and permeability enhancement technology is an advanced coalbed methane (CBM) reservoir stimulation method designed to increase the effective permeability of low-permeability coal seams—those with initial permeability typically below 1.0 × 10⁻³ μm²—by injecting supercritical or subcritical carbon dioxide under controlled pressure conditions. The technology leverages the unique physical and chemical properties of CO₂ to generate hydraulic fractures, shear fractures, and micro-fracture networks within the coal matrix, thereby creating new flow channels for methane desorption and drainage.

The fundamental mechanism operates on three interrelated principles:

The Hongfa Coal Mine trial study represents a systematic investigation into the optimization of these mechanisms under specific geological conditions, including coal seam thickness (typically 1.5–3.5 m), burial depth (600–1200 m), in-situ stress conditions (horizontal stress ratio λ = 1.1–1.4), and initial gas content (8–14 m³/t).

2. Category and Business Positioning

Within the broader portfolio of Cladding Technology Shanxi Co., Ltd., this technology entry represents the company's extension into coal mine safety and gas control engineering services. While the company's core competencies reside in bimetallic cladding, weld overlay, and explosion welding, the coal mine technology domain serves as a critical adjacent market that:

This technology falls under the category of coal mine gas drainage and disaster prevention engineering, specifically within the sub-domain of reservoir permeability enhancement for coalbed methane recovery and outburst prevention. It aligns with national strategies for coal mine safety production, carbon neutrality, and energy efficiency.

3. Technical Purpose and Value

3.1 Primary Technical Objectives

The CO₂ fracturing technology for low-permeability coal seams at Hongfa Coal Mine was developed to address the following critical challenges:

  1. Gas Drainage Efficiency: Increase the effective drainage radius from the typical 5–8 m (in untreated low-permeability seams) to 15–25 m, enabling adequate pre-drainage before mining operations.
  2. Permeability Improvement: Achieve a permeability enhancement factor of 3–8× the initial value through controlled fracture network creation.
  3. Outburst Risk Mitigation: Reduce coal and gas outburst risk by pre-releasing gas energy and creating stable drainage pathways.
  4. CBM Recovery Rate: Increase coalbed methane recovery rate from below 30% to above 50%, contributing to renewable energy production and methane emission reduction.

3.2 Quantitative Value Metrics

Performance Indicator Pre-Treatment (Baseline) Post-Treatment (Target) Improvement Factor
Effective Permeability (× 10⁻³ μm²) 0.3–0.8 2.4–6.0 3–8×
Drainage Gas Concentration (%) 15–25 45–65 2–3×
Drainage Gas Flow Rate (m³/min) 0.5–1.5 3.0–8.0 3–5×
Effective Drainage Radius (m) 5–8 15–25 2–3×
Pre-Drainage Time Required (days) 60–90 25–45 2–3× reduction
CBM Recovery Rate (%) < 30 > 50 Significant

4. Key Process and Implementation Points

4.1 Overall Process Flow

The CO₂ fracturing and permeability enhancement process follows a structured sequence of operations, each requiring precise control and monitoring:

  1. Pre-Drilling Preparation: Borehole drilling and casing installation
  2. Plug Setting and Zoning: Establishment of isolation plugs to define treatment zones
  3. Initial Pressure Testing: Determination of injection pressure thresholds
  4. CO₂ Injection Phase 1 (Pre-Pressurization): Low-rate CO₂ injection for matrix swelling
  5. CO₂ Injection Phase 2 (Fracturing): High-rate, high-pressure CO₂ injection for fracture initiation
  6. Pressure Holding and Soaking: Maintenance of injection pressure for fracture propagation
  7. Pressure Release and Monitoring: Controlled depressurization with continuous data acquisition
  8. Post-Treatment Evaluation: Permeability testing and drainage performance verification

4.2 Critical Process Parameters

Process Step Parameter Typical Range Control Requirement
Pre-Pressurization Injection Pressure 8–12 MPa Gradual ramp-up, rate ≤ 0.5 MPa/min
Pre-Pressurization Injection Rate 50–150 L/min Stable flow, no surges
Pre-Pressurization Duration 30–60 min Until pressure stabilization
Fracturing Injection Peak Injection Pressure 18–25 MPa Based on coal strength and in-situ stress
Fracturing Injection Injection Rate 300–800 L/min Sufficient to overcome fracture initiation threshold
Fracturing Injection Total CO₂ Volume 2,000–5,000 L per zone Calculated based on seam geometry
Pressure Holding Holding Pressure 12–18 MPa 60–80% of peak pressure
Pressure Holding Holding Duration 2–6 hours Until pressure decline rate < 0.1 MPa/h
Depressurization Release Rate 0.5–1.0 MPa/min Controlled, no sudden decompression

4.3 Equipment Configuration

The Hongfa Coal Mine trial employed a specialized CO₂ fracturing system comprising the following key components:

4.4 Implementation Sequence for Hongfa Coal Mine Trial

The trial was conducted on the 3# coal seam at a depth of approximately 850 m, with the following specific implementation parameters:

5. Applicable Standards and Acceptance Criteria

5.1 Governing Standards

The CO₂ fracturing and permeability enhancement technology must comply with the following national and industry standards:

5.2 Acceptance Criteria for Treatment Effectiveness

Acceptance Item Criteria Verification Method
Permeability Enhancement Effective permeability ≥ 3× initial value Flow testing (constant pressure/flow method)
Drainage Gas Concentration ≥ 30% after 7 days of post-treatment drainage Continuous gas concentration monitoring
Drainage Gas Flow Rate ≥ 2.0 m³/min sustained for ≥ 30 days Flow meter readings at borehole outlet
Effective Drainage Radius ≥ 15 m confirmed by cross-borehole testing Tracer gas or pressure interference testing
Plug Integrity No leakage at 1.5× maximum injection pressure Pressure test with 30 min hold time
Wellbore Integrity No casing deformation or seal failure Casing inspection (downhole camera or pressure test)
Safety Compliance Zero gas explosion incidents during operation Safety audit and incident reporting

5.3 Environmental and Safety Standards

6. Common Risks and Controls

6.1 Technical Risks

Risk Category Specific Risk Probability Impact Mitigation Measures
Fracture Geometry Fractures propagate in unintended direction (not perpendicular to σmin) Medium Reduced effective drainage area Pre-analyze in-situ stress field; adjust injection rate and volume; use multi-stage injection
Plug Failure Isolation plug leaks or fails under high pressure Low-Medium Loss of injection pressure; treatment zone contamination Use dual-plug configuration; conduct pre-injection pressure test; maintain 1.5× safety factor on plug rating
Matrix Swelling Excess Excessive CO₂ adsorption causes coal matrix swelling that closes existing fractures Medium Reduced permeability after initial enhancement Control pre-pressurization phase duration; optimize CO₂ injection temperature; consider hybrid N₂/CO₂ injection
Temperature Effects Joule-Thomson cooling during CO₂ expansion causes low temperatures near injection point High Equipment damage; ice formation; coal thermal cracking Control injection temperature at 20–40°C; use heated injection lines; monitor downhole temperature
Fracture Closure Fractures close due to stress recovery after depressurization Medium Temporary rather than permanent permeability improvement Use proppant (sand or ceramic) in hybrid fracturing; maintain residual pressure; design for shear fracture dominance over tensile fracture

6.2 Safety Risks

6.3 Risk Control Framework

A comprehensive risk management framework aligned with ISO 31000:2018 (Risk Management — Guidelines) should be implemented, encompassing:

  1. Risk Identification: Systematic hazard analysis for each process step using Job Hazard Analysis (JHA)
  2. Risk Assessment: Quantitative evaluation using probability × consequence matrix
  3. Risk Mitigation: Implementation of engineering controls, administrative controls, and PPE
  4. Risk Monitoring: Continuous real-time monitoring during operations with defined alarm thresholds
  5. Emergency Response: Pre-planned emergency procedures with regular drill exercises

7. Application Scenarios Across Company Technology Routes

7.1 Integration with TIG/MIG Weld Overlay Route

The CO₂ fracturing technology creates synergistic opportunities with the company's weld overlay capabilities:

7.2 Integration with Hydraulic Explosive Bonding Route

7.3 Integration with Explosion Welding Route

8. Contribution to Qualification Building, Product Delivery, and Customer Value

8.1 Qualification Building

The Hongfa Coal Mine CO₂ fracturing trial study contributes to the company's qualification portfolio in several dimensions:

8.2 Product Delivery Enhancement

8.3 Customer Value Proposition

Value Dimension Specific Contribution Quantifiable Benefit
Safety Reduced outburst risk through enhanced gas drainage Outburst probability reduction of 60–80%
Productivity Shorter pre-drainage time enabling faster mining advance 25–40% reduction in pre-drainage duration
Revenue Increased CBM recovery for sale as renewable energy Additional 500,000–2,000,000 m³ CBM per treatment zone
Environmental Reduced methane emissions (25× more potent GHG than CO₂) 1,000–5,000 tCO₂e avoided per treatment zone
Equipment Longevity Clad injection equipment with extended service life 3–5× longer replacement intervals vs. unclad equipment

9. Conclusions and Forward Outlook

The CO₂ fracturing and permeability enhancement technology for low-permeability coal seams, as demonstrated through the Hongfa Coal Mine trial study, represents a technically sophisticated and commercially valuable capability that extends the company's service portfolio beyond traditional cladding manufacturing. The technology addresses critical safety, environmental, and economic needs of the coal mining industry while creating natural integration points with the company's core cladding and weld overlay products.

Future development directions include:

By maintaining technical rigor in process development, strict adherence to applicable standards (GB 50451-2019, AQ 1026-2019, MT/T 1007-2006), and continuous integration of cladding technology solutions into coal mine equipment, the company positions itself as a comprehensive technology provider serving the coal mining sector's evolving safety and efficiency requirements.