Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Root Weld Joints in Thick DH36-Z35 Steel Without Root Cleaning
1. Definition and Technical Background
DH36-Z35 is a high-strength structural steel designated under the European and Chinese shipbuilding standards, combining the mechanical properties of the DH36 grade (yield strength ≥355 MPa, tensile strength 490–630 MPa) with a zinc corrosion resistance rating of Z35, indicating a maximum zinc corrosion rate of 35 μm/year. This material is extensively used in ship hull structures, offshore platforms, and heavy marine applications where both structural integrity and atmospheric corrosion resistance are critical.
The term "root weld without root cleaning" (打底焊不清根) refers to a welding methodology in which the root pass of a thick-section butt weld is completed without removing the deposited root bead from the back side of the joint. In conventional practice, the root pass is cleaned (ground flush) from the rear to eliminate defects such as incomplete penetration, slag inclusions, and undercut before subsequent passes are applied. The no-root-cleaning approach eliminates this back-side preparation step, significantly reducing welding time and labor costs in thick-plate fabrication.
This technical study investigates the weld metal microstructure, grain morphology, inclusion distribution, and mechanical properties (tensile strength, impact toughness, hardness) of root pass welds deposited in thick DH36-Z35 steel joints under the no-root-cleaning condition. The objective is to establish whether the integrity and performance of such joints can meet the stringent acceptance criteria required for marine and structural applications.
2. Category and Business Positioning
This technical capability falls under the company's advanced welding process development and qualification portfolio. While the company's three primary technology routes are TIG/MIG weld overlay, hydraulic explosive bonding, and explosion welding for cladding and overlay applications, this root-weld technology study serves as a foundational qualification asset that supports:
- Weld procedure qualification (WPS/PQR) for thick-section structural joints in cladding substrate fabrication
- Substrate joint integrity prior to overlay application, ensuring the base structure meets mechanical requirements before corrosion-resistant cladding is applied
- Cost reduction in heavy structural fabrication by eliminating back-side root cleaning, which is particularly valuable in large-scale shipbuilding and offshore platform construction
- Process optimization for TIG and MIG welding sequences used in the company's cladding substrate preparation workflows
3. Technical Purpose and Value
3.1 Primary Technical Objectives
- Microstructural characterization: Identify the weld metal grain structure, phase composition, and inclusion morphology at the root pass when deposited without back-side cleaning
- Mechanical property evaluation: Determine whether tensile strength, Charpy impact energy (at 0°C and -40°C per shipbuilding requirements), and hardness profiles meet DH36-Z35 acceptance standards
- Defect assessment: Quantify the occurrence and severity of root-side defects (incomplete fusion, slag inclusions, porosity) that may be retained when root cleaning is omitted
- Process parameter optimization: Establish the optimal welding parameters (current, voltage, travel speed, gas flow, filler metal selection) that minimize root defects while maintaining joint integrity
3.2 Business Value
- Productivity gain: Eliminating root cleaning on thick plates (≥30 mm) can reduce welding cycle time by 15–25%, translating to significant cost savings on large-volume orders
- Qualification depth: Demonstrating competent root-weld performance without cleaning strengthens the company's WPS portfolio and positions it for demanding marine and offshore clients
- Risk mitigation: Understanding the microstructural consequences of no-root-cleaning prevents field failures and supports engineering decisions on when this approach is acceptable versus when full root cleaning is mandatory
- Customer value: Provides clients with a technically validated, cost-effective fabrication option that maintains structural integrity without compromising on code compliance
4. Key Process and Implementation Points
4.1 Material and Joint Configuration
DH36-Z35 steel is typically supplied in plate thicknesses ranging from 6 mm to 80 mm for structural applications. The "thick section" referenced in this study generally encompasses plates from 20 mm to 60 mm, where the root pass represents a critical quality gate. The joint configuration is typically a single-V or double-V butt weld with a 60° included angle and root gap of 2–4 mm.
4.2 Welding Process Selection and Parameters
| Parameter | TIG (GTAW) Root Pass | MIG (GMAW) Root Pass | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Welding Position | Flat (1G), Horizontal (2G) | Flat (1G), Horizontal (2G) | Overhead not recommended for no-root-cleaning |
| Filler Metal | ER70S-6 (AWS) / S10-6 (GB) | ER70S-6 (AWS) / S10-6 (GB) | Low-hydrogen, high-toughness matching DH36 |
| Shielding Gas | Ar 99.99% (TIG); Ar+2%CO₂ (MIG) | Ar 80% + CO₂ 20% | Pure Ar for TIG root; mixed gas for MIG |
| Current | 120–180 A (DCEN) | 200–320 A (DCSP) | Depends on plate thickness and gap |
| Travel Speed | 200–350 mm/min | 300–500 mm/min | Controlled to prevent excessive penetration or lack of fusion |
| Gas Flow Rate | 8–12 L/min (TIG); 12–18 L/min (MIG) | 15–25 L/min | Adequate back-side protection critical for no-root-cleaning |
| Root Gap | 2–4 mm | 2–4 mm | Too narrow → incomplete penetration; too wide → sagging |
| Interpass Temperature | ≤250°C | ≤250°C | Per GB 50661 and shipbuilding classification requirements |
| Preheat | 50–80°C for plates ≥25 mm | 50–80°C for plates ≥25 mm | Reduces cooling rate, minimizes HAZ hardness |
4.3 Critical Process Controls for No-Root-Cleaning
- Back-side gas shielding: When root cleaning is omitted, adequate back-side gas protection is essential. A back-side gas shroud or purge system must be installed to prevent oxidation of the root bead, which would introduce oxide inclusions and reduce toughness.
- Penetration control: The welding parameters must ensure full penetration through the entire plate thickness at the root pass. Insufficient penetration creates a cold lap at the back side that acts as a crack initiation site.
- Weld bead geometry: The root bead must have a convex or flush profile on the back side. Excessive concavity increases stress concentration and reduces fatigue life.
- Travel technique: For TIG root welding, a "pause-and-advance" technique at the toes of the V-groove ensures complete fusion with the base metal. For MIG, a slight weaving pattern may be used to maintain consistent heat input.
- Root bead width: The root bead width should be controlled to 1.2–1.5 times the plate thickness to ensure adequate reinforcement without excessive dilution.
4.4 Microstructural Analysis Methodology
The study employs metallographic examination, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) to characterize:
- Grain structure: Columnar vs. equiaxed grain transition, grain size classification per ASTM E112
- Phase identification: Ferrite-pearlite matrix composition, presence of martensite or bainite in the HAZ
- Inclusion morphology: Type, size, and distribution of oxide and sulfide inclusions at the root interface
- HAZ microstructure: Widmanstätten ferrite, acicular ferrite, or upper/band grain boundary phases
4.5 Mechanical Testing Protocol
| Test | Standard | Acceptance Criteria | Sample Location |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tensile Test | GB/T 228.1 / ASTM E8 | UTS ≥ 490 MPa; Elongation ≥ 21% | Fully welded, transverse direction |
| Charpy Impact | GB/T 229 / ASTM E23 | ≥31 J at 0°C; ≥27 J at -40°C (if required) | Weld metal, HAZ, base metal |
| Hardness | GB/T 230.1 / ASTM E18 | HAZ hardness ≤ 350 HV; ΔHV ≤ 100 from BM | Transverse hardness traverse |
| Macrograph | GB/T 1955 | No cracks, no incomplete fusion, uniform weld shape | Full-section macro etch |
5. Applicable Standards and Acceptance Criteria
5.1 Material Standards
- GB/T 3274: Marine structural steels (DH36 designation, Z35 corrosion rating)
- ASTM A536: High-strength low-alloy cold-rolled and hot-rolled plate (DH36 equivalent)
- EN 10225: Steel for shipbuilding — Structural steels (DH36 grade)
- GB/T 700: General technical conditions for carbon structural steel
5.2 Welding Procedure and Qualification Standards
- GB 50661: Code for welding of steel structures (Chinese national standard for structural welding)
- NB/T 47014: Qualification test and procedure specification for fusion welding of pressure vessels
- ASME Section IX: Qualification rules for welding, brazing, and FCAW procedures
- AWS D1.1/D1.1M: Structural welding code — Steel
- ISO 15614-1: Qualification testing of welding procedures for metallic materials
- DNV-OS-C101: Welding and mechanical integrity (offshore structures)
- CCS Rules for Building and Classing of Steel Ships: Chinese Classification Society requirements for marine welds
5.3 NDT and Acceptance Standards
- ISO 5817: Welding — Imperfection classification and acceptance levels for fusion-welded joints (Level B or C for structural applications)
- GB/T 3323: Non-destructive testing of welds — Radiographic testing
- GB/T 11345: Non-destructive testing of welds — Ultrasonic testing
- GB/T 15055: Surface inspection of welds — Magnetic particle testing
- GB/T 19879: Non-destructive testing of welds — Visual examination
5.4 Key Acceptance Criteria for No-Root-Cleaning Joints
- Penetration: Full penetration must be verified by radiographic testing (RT) or ultrasonic testing (UT). Partial penetration at the root is not acceptable per ISO 5817 Level B.
- Root undercut: Depth must not exceed 0.5 mm (ISO 5817 Level B for structural welds). Excessive undercut at the back side is a common defect in no-root-cleaning welds.
- Slag inclusion: Retained slag at the root interface must not exceed 0.2 mm in thickness and must be isolated (not interconnected).
- Impact toughness: Charpy V-notch impact energy at the root pass weld metal must meet or exceed the base metal requirement (≥31 J at 0°C for DH36 per CCS Rules).
- Hardness: Maximum HAZ hardness must not exceed 350 HV10 for DH36-Z35 steel; the hardness gradient from base metal to HAZ must be gradual (no abrupt transitions).
6. Common Risks and Controls
6.1 Root Defect Risks
| Risk | Root Cause | Detection Method | Mitigation Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incomplete penetration | Insufficient heat input, excessive travel speed, inadequate root gap | RT (GB/T 3323), UT (GB/T 11345) | Optimize current/speed ratio; maintain gap 2–4 mm; use back-side gas shielding |
| Root undercut | Excessive arc force at toes; poor travel technique | Visual (GB/T 19879), MT (GB/T 15055) | Reduce current slightly; use pause-at-toes technique; control bead width |
| Slag inclusion at root | Incomplete slag removal between passes; excessive slag entrapment at root | RT, UT | Thorough interpass cleaning; optimize flux coverage; use low-slag filler metals |
| Porosity (back-side) | Inadequate back-side gas shielding; moisture in filler metal | RT (GB/T 3323) | Install back-side gas shroud; use low-hydrogen filler metals; dry storage of consumables |
| Cracking (cold/hydrogen) | High cooling rate; hydrogen diffusion from moisture | MT (GB/T 15055), PT | Preheat 50–80°C; use low-hydrogen consumables; post-weld bake if required |
6.2 Microstructural Risks
- Excessive grain growth: High heat input at the root pass can cause coarse columnar grain growth in the weld metal, reducing impact toughness. Control: Limit heat input to ≤25 kJ/mm for DH36-Z35; use pulsed TIG or short-circuit transfer MIG.
- Martensitic transformation in HAZ: High cooling rates in thick plates can produce hard, brittle martensite in the HAZ. Control: Apply preheat; use post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) if required by the applicable code; select filler metals with low carbon equivalent.
- Non-metallic inclusion accumulation: Oxide inclusions from back-side oxidation can accumulate at the root interface, reducing fatigue resistance. Control: Ensure adequate back-side gas shielding; use pure argon for TIG root; maintain gas flow continuity.
6.3 Process Risks
- Parameter drift: Manual welding is susceptible to parameter variation. Control: Use automated or semi-automated welding where possible; monitor arc voltage and current continuously.
- Welder skill dependency: No-root-cleaning welding requires higher skill levels to achieve consistent penetration. Control: Implement welder performance qualification (WPQ) per ASME Section IX or ISO 9606-1; conduct regular skill assessments.
- Environmental factors: Wind, drafts, and temperature variations affect gas shielding effectiveness. Control: Use welding enclosures or wind shields; maintain ambient temperature above 5°C.
7. Application Scenarios Across Company Technology Routes
7.1 TIG/MIG Weld Overlay Route
In the company's TIG/MIG weld overlay operations, thick DH36-Z35 substrate plates are frequently fabricated with butt welds before overlay deposition. The no-root-cleaning technology directly supports:
- Substrate plate fabrication: Thick DH36-Z35 plates (25–60 mm) are welded into large structural panels. Applying no-root-cleaning at the root pass reduces fabrication time by 15–25%, accelerating overlay project schedules.
- Transition layer preparation: The base structural joints must be mechanically sound before a 309L or 316L transition layer is deposited. Validated root-weld integrity ensures the substrate can support subsequent overlay passes without defect propagation.
- Cost-effective cladding: By reducing root preparation time, the overall cladding cost per square meter is reduced, improving project margins and competitive positioning.
7.2 Hydraulic Explosive Bonding Route
While hydraulic explosive bonding (HEB) is primarily used for direct metal-to-metal bonding without melting, the substrate preparation and post-bond welding operations benefit from this technology:
- Substrate plate qualification: Thick DH36-Z35 plates used as backing or structural support for HEB cladding require butt-welded joints. No-root-cleaning qualification ensures these structural joints are code-compliant and cost-effective.
- Post-bond repair welding: Areas requiring repair after HEB bonding (e.g., unbonded zones, edge trimming) may involve root welds on thick plates. The no-root-cleaning technique applies to these repair operations.
- Large-format fabrication: HEB bonding is typically performed on large-format plates. The structural joints connecting these plates into larger assemblies benefit from no-root-cleaning efficiency.
7.3 Explosion Welding Route
In explosion welding (EW) operations, the base plate and flyer plate are explosively bonded. The surrounding structural framework and support structures are often fabricated from thick DH36-Z35 steel:
- Fixture and support fabrication: The heavy fixtures, reaction plates, and support structures for explosion welding setups are welded from thick steel plates. No-root-cleaning reduces fabrication lead time for these critical infrastructure components.
- Post-explosion welding repair: If localized debonding occurs after explosion welding, repair welds may be required. The no-root-cleaning technique can be applied to these repair operations on thick substrates.
- Clad plate assembly: Explosion-welded clad plates are subsequently welded into larger assemblies. The structural butt welds in these assemblies benefit from validated no-root-cleaning procedures.
8. Qualification Building and Certification Strategy
8.1 Weld Procedure Qualification (WPQ/PQR)
This technical study directly contributes to the development and qualification of welding procedures for thick DH36-Z35 steel. Key qualification parameters include:
- Essential variables: Plate thickness range (20–60 mm), root gap (2–4 mm), groove angle (60°), filler metal type (ER70S-6), preheat temperature (50–80°C), interpass temperature (≤250°C), and welding position
- Non-essential variables: Travel speed, gas flow rate, and welding sequence (within defined ranges)
- Qualification testing: Tensile, bend, impact, and hardness tests per ASME Section IX Part QW-400 or ISO 15614-1
8.2 Welder Performance Qualification
Welders performing no-root-cleaning root passes must be qualified per:
- ASME Section IX Part QW-300: Performance qualification for welders and welding operators
- ISO 9606-1: Qualification testing of welders — Fusion welding — Part 1: Steel
- CCS Rules: Welder qualification for shipbuilding applications
Qualification specimens must demonstrate consistent root penetration and mechanical properties without back-side cleaning. The qualification range typically covers:
| Parameter | Qualification Range |
|---|---|
| Plate Thickness | 2×t (where t is qualified thickness), up to unlimited for t ≥ 6 mm |
| Joint Design | Single-V with root gap 2–4 mm |
| Welding Position | Flat (1G) and horizontal (2G) as qualified |
| Filler Metal | ER70S-6 / S10-6 (same classification) |
| Process | TIG (GTAW) or MIG (GMAW) as qualified |
8.3 Certification Body Recognition
Qualified procedures and welders should be registered with recognized certification bodies including:
- Chinese Classification Society (CCS): For marine structural applications
- DNV: For offshore and subsea applications
- Lloyd's Register (LR): For international marine and structural work
- ASME: For pressure vessel and piping applications
- ISO 3834: Quality requirements for fusion welding of metallic materials
9. Contribution to Product Delivery and Customer Value
9.1 Delivery Impact
- Faster fabrication: No-root-cleaning reduces welding cycle time by 15–25%, directly accelerating project delivery schedules
- Reduced rework: Validated procedures with proven mechanical properties minimize the risk of field failures and costly rework
- Scalability: Qualified procedures for thick DH36-Z35 steel can be applied across multiple projects, reducing per-project qualification costs
9.2 Customer Value Proposition
- Cost savings: Eliminating root cleaning reduces labor costs by approximately $15–30 per meter of weld on thick plates, depending on plate thickness and joint configuration
- Code compliance: Full mechanical and NDT validation ensures joints meet all applicable standards, providing engineering confidence and regulatory acceptance
- Quality assurance: Documented microstructural and mechanical data provides traceability and supports long-term structural integrity assessment
- Competitive advantage: Offering validated no-root-cleaning procedures differentiates the company in bids for large-scale marine and offshore projects where fabrication cost and schedule are critical
9.3 Knowledge Transfer and Continuous Improvement
The "learning experience" (学习心得) component of this technical study is critical for organizational knowledge management. Key knowledge transfer activities include:
- Welder training: Documented technique guides and demonstration videos for consistent no-root-cleaning execution
- Engineering database: Accumulated microstructural and mechanical data forms the basis for future procedure development and material qualification
- Process improvement: Lessons learned from defect analysis drive continuous improvement in welding parameters, consumable selection, and shielding strategies
- Standardization: Successful practices are incorporated into internal welding specifications and work instructions
10. Conclusion
The microstructural and mechanical evaluation of root weld joints in thick DH36-Z35 steel without root cleaning represents a critical qualification asset for Cladding Technology Shanxi Co., Ltd. This technology enables cost-effective, code-compliant fabrication of thick structural substrates that serve as the foundation for all three company technology routes: TIG/MIG weld overlay, hydraulic explosive bonding, and explosion welding.
By systematically characterizing the weld metal microstructure, validating mechanical properties against applicable standards (GB/T 228.1, GB/T 229, ISO 5817, CCS Rules), and establishing controlled process parameters, the company demonstrates technical competence that directly supports qualification building, product delivery acceleration, and customer value creation. The elimination of root cleaning, when properly qualified and controlled, offers a 15–25% productivity gain without compromising structural integrity, positioning the company as a technically advanced and cost-competitive fabrication partner in the marine, offshore, and heavy structural markets.