Dynamic Response Analysis of CO₂ Phase-Change Fracturing for Subway Station Construction

1. Definition and Technical Principles

CO₂ phase-change fracturing (also referred to as supercritical CO₂ fracturing or CO₂ gas expansion fracturing) is a controlled mechanical energy release technology that exploits the dramatic volumetric expansion of carbon dioxide during its phase transition from a supercritical or liquid state to a gaseous state. When CO₂ is pressurized beyond its critical point (31.1 °C, 7.38 MPa) and confined within a sealed borehole, the subsequent controlled release generates rapid expansion—up to 500–1,000 times the original volume—producing fracture-initiating pressures exceeding 200 MPa at the borehole wall. This mechanism creates controlled, directional fractures in rock and soil media without the use of high explosives, making it particularly suitable for urban construction environments where vibration and blast safety are paramount.

The dynamic response analysis component of this technology focuses on quantifying the transient stress-wave propagation, ground vibration characteristics, and structural interaction effects generated during the fracturing event. For subway station construction—typically situated in densely built urban environments with adjacent metro tunnels, utility corridors, and critical infrastructure—the dynamic response analysis provides the essential data foundation for safety clearance determination, construction sequencing optimization, and structural integrity verification of neighboring assets.

2. Category and Business Positioning

Within the operational framework of a cladding technology enterprise, CO₂ phase-change fracturing technology occupies a strategic support role across three distinct business dimensions:

3. Technical Purpose and Value

3.1 Core Technical Objectives

The dynamic response analysis of CO₂ phase-change fracturing in subway station construction serves the following primary objectives:

  1. Vibration Impact Assessment: Quantify peak particle velocity (PPV), acceleration, and displacement at various distances from the fracturing source to establish safe working envelopes for adjacent structures and utilities.
  2. Stress Wave Characterization: Determine the frequency content, duration, and propagation attenuation of stress waves generated during fracturing events to validate analytical models against field measurements.
  3. Structural Safety Verification: Evaluate the dynamic loading effects on existing subway tunnels, building foundations, and underground utilities to confirm compliance with regulatory vibration limits.
  4. Construction Optimization: Use dynamic response data to refine fracturing parameters (charge quantity, borehole geometry, initiation sequence) for optimal fracture patterns while minimizing adverse dynamic effects.

3.2 Value to the Cladding Technology Enterprise

The acquisition of expertise in CO₂ phase-change fracturing dynamic response analysis provides the following value propositions:

4. Key Process and Implementation Points

4.1 CO₂ Phase-Change Fracturing Process Flow

Process Stage Key Parameters Technical Requirements
1. Borehole Drilling Diameter: 76–113 mm; Depth: 5–30 m; Inclinability: 0–90° Precise positioning within ±50 mm; deviation control <1°/10 m
2. CO₂ Charging Pressure: 30–45 MPa; Temperature: >31.1 °C (supercritical); Volume: 10–50 L per charge Hydraulic pump system with pressure monitoring; thermal management to maintain supercritical state
3. Charge Assembly Explosive cap (initiator): 5–20 g; Charge length: 0.5–2.0 m; Plug length: 1.0–2.0 m Sealed charge assembly; detonator or electric initiation system; safety interlocks
4. Initiation and Fracture Expansion ratio: 500–1,000×; Fracture pressure: 150–300 MPa; Event duration: <100 ms Remote initiation; personnel clearance >300 m; real-time monitoring systems active
5. Post-Fracture Assessment Fracture pattern inspection; vibration data review; structural integrity check Visual inspection; ultrasonic testing of adjacent structures; data comparison against thresholds

4.2 Dynamic Response Analysis Methodology

The dynamic response analysis encompasses both numerical simulation and field measurement components:

  1. Numerical Modeling: Finite element analysis (FEA) using explicit dynamic solvers (such as LS-DYNA or ABAQUS/Explicit) to simulate stress wave propagation through heterogeneous ground media, incorporating soil-rock interface conditions and structural boundary conditions.
  2. Field Instrumentation: Deployment of three-component geophones (PPV sensors), accelerometers, and displacement transducers at multiple measurement points surrounding the fracturing zone, with sampling rates ≥2,000 Hz and frequency response ≥200 Hz.
  3. Data Processing: Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis for frequency content characterization; time-history analysis for peak and cumulative effect evaluation; statistical analysis across multiple fracturing events for trend identification.
  4. Model Validation: Comparison of numerical predictions against field measurements to calibrate material parameters, damping coefficients, and boundary conditions for subsequent predictive analyses.

4.3 Critical Dynamic Response Parameters

Parameter Typical Range Control Threshold (Urban Subway) Measurement Method
Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) 5–50 mm/s (near field) ≤25 mm/s (existing structures); ≤10 mm/s (sensitive equipment) Triaxial geophone, 10–200 Hz
Peak Acceleration 0.1–2.0 g ≤0.5 g (structural elements) Accelerometer, 0.1–500 Hz
Peak Displacement 0.1–5.0 mm ≤2.0 mm (cumulative) LVDT or total station
Dominant Frequency 5–50 Hz Avoid resonance frequencies of adjacent structures FFT analysis
Event Duration 50–200 ms Single event; no sustained loading Time-history recording

5. Applicable Standards and Acceptance Criteria

5.1 International Standards

5.2 Chinese National and Industry Standards

5.3 Acceptance Criteria Summary

Acceptance Item Criterion Evidence Required
Ground vibration PPV ≤ regulatory limit for each structure category Continuous monitoring data records with time stamps
Structural displacement Cumulative displacement ≤ 2.0 mm; rate ≤ 0.1 mm/day Survey records; LVDT/total station data
Crack development No new cracks; existing cracks show no widening Crack monitoring gauge records; visual inspection reports
Equipment operation No functional degradation of sensitive equipment Equipment performance verification records
Weld integrity (adjacent clad components) No new indications per NDT criteria UT/MT/PT inspection reports per applicable WPS

6. Common Risks and Controls

6.1 Technical Risks

Risk Category Description Control Measures
Excessive Vibration PPV exceeding thresholds causing damage to adjacent structures or clad component welds Pre-fracturing vibration survey; progressive charge testing; real-time monitoring with automatic shutdown triggers
Uncontrolled Fracture Pattern Fractures propagating toward critical infrastructure or clad component foundations 3D geological modeling; borehole trajectory optimization; fracture direction control via borehole inclination
CO₂ Leakage Supercritical CO₂ leakage during charging or pre-initiation causing asphyxiation hazard Pressure monitoring; gas detection systems; confined space protocols; emergency ventilation
Resonance Amplification Fracturing frequency matching natural frequency of adjacent structure causing amplified response Prior modal analysis of adjacent structures; frequency-based initiation timing; charge quantity adjustment
Ground Settlement Cumulative fracturing events causing progressive ground subsidence affecting clad plate/pipeline alignment Sequential settlement monitoring; fracturing rate control; compensation grouting capability

6.2 Quality and Safety Controls

  1. Pre-Construction Phase: Complete geological investigation; identify all buried utilities and structures within 500 m radius; establish baseline vibration and displacement measurements; develop emergency response plan approved by regulatory authorities.
  2. Construction Phase: Implement progressive charge testing (starting with minimum charge and incrementally increasing); maintain continuous vibration monitoring with data transmission to control center; enforce personnel clearance distances; document all fracturing events with complete parameter records.
  3. Post-Construction Phase: Conduct comprehensive structural inspection of all affected assets; perform NDT on adjacent welded connections and clad component interfaces; compile final dynamic response report; archive all monitoring data for regulatory review and future reference.

7. Application Scenarios Across Company Technology Routes

7.1 TIG/MIG Weld Overlay Applications

CO₂ phase-change fracturing dynamic response analysis directly informs the protection and verification of weld overlay coatings in the following scenarios:

7.2 Hydraulic Explosive Bonding Applications

The dynamic response analysis expertise contributes to hydraulic explosive bonding operations in the following contexts:

7.3 Explosion Welding Applications

For explosion-welded clad products, the dynamic response analysis capability supports the following applications:

8. Contribution to Qualification Building and Customer Value

8.1 Qualification Building

Mastery of CO₂ phase-change fracturing dynamic response analysis contributes to the company's qualification portfolio in the following ways:

  1. Multi-Disciplinary Engineering Competence: Demonstrates capability to interface with geotechnical, structural, and construction engineering disciplines—essential for participation in EPC projects requiring integrated technology delivery.
  2. Construction Safety Management: Validates the company's ability to manage construction-adjacent activities that may affect clad component integrity, strengthening safety management system certifications (ISO 45001).
  3. Technical Advisory Credibility: Positions the company as a technical authority capable of providing construction methodology guidance alongside product supply, enhancing value proposition in competitive bidding scenarios.
  4. Standard Compliance Evidence: Provides documented experience with vibration monitoring and dynamic response assessment per GB/T 51214-2017 and GB 6722-2014, supporting compliance demonstrations for regulated industry clients.

8.2 Customer Value Delivery

9. Conclusion

The dynamic response analysis of CO₂ phase-change fracturing for subway station construction represents a strategically valuable technical capability for a cladding technology enterprise operating in the infrastructure and heavy industry sectors. While not a core manufacturing technology, this analytical capability bridges the gap between product fabrication and field installation in complex construction environments. By integrating dynamic response analysis into the company's technical service offerings, the enterprise enhances its qualification depth, strengthens customer relationships through proactive risk management, and positions itself as a comprehensive technical partner rather than a component supplier alone. The systematic approach to vibration assessment, structural impact evaluation, and construction optimization described herein provides a replicable methodology applicable across the company's full technology portfolio—TIG/MIG weld overlay, hydraulic explosive bonding, and explosion welding—ensuring that clad products maintain their designed integrity throughout construction, installation, and long-term service.